From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: GDB <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Does gdb 5.2 work with statically linked thread application under Linux?
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 13:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020307133928.A12672@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020307024841.A24509@nevyn.them.org>; from drow@mvista.com on Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 02:48:41AM -0500
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 02:48:41AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:30:50PM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > Does gdb 5.2 work with statically linked thread application under
> > Linux? It doesn't work for me at all. It doesn't know any thread.
> > I have a patch which works for gdb 5.1. Now it doesn't work for 5.2
> > anymore.
>
> My fault, I think.
>
> The problem is that in a dynamically linked binary
> thread_db_new_objfile will be called for every library is loaded. At
> this point current_target is "child", so target_has_execution is true.
> But with a static binary, the first time the function is called objfile
> is NULL, and the second time current_target is "exec" (which has
> target_has_execution set false).
>
> Perhaps target_has_execution was not the right check after all, if
> "exec" has it set false (which makes fairly little sense to me...) or
> perhaps we need to call the hook again later. Michael, any idea?
>
What is the problem if "|| !target_has_execution" is removed? I removed
it. Gdb now works on statically linked thread application as well as
core file. Did I miss soemthing?
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-07 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-06 23:30 H . J . Lu
2002-03-06 23:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-03-07 13:39 ` H . J . Lu [this message]
2002-03-07 14:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-03-07 15:08 ` H . J . Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020307133928.A12672@lucon.org \
--to=hjl@lucon.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox