From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12685 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2002 18:34:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12577 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2002 18:34:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2002 18:34:19 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16f3TT-0003Dq-00; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 13:34:15 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:34:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Iso-H Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb-5.x and step over inline functions Message-ID: <20020224133415.A12371@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Iso-H , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:09:11PM +0200, Iso-H wrote: > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Iso-H wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 03:14:00PM +0200, Iso-H wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Iso-H wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any way to step over inline functions > > > > > > when using gdb >= 5.1 ? Some (commandline or other)option > > > > > > perhaps? > > > > > .... > > > > > > Could you provide a small testcase, with source and a compile > > > commandline? > > > > It seems to be so that it is difficult to create > > just simple "demo", but I'll try... > > > > Ok. here it is; one file only ;) > As you can see, gdb doesn't show "f_func", but Demo_t's > constructor instead ! Thanks! I think I see what's going on; I'll take a better look at it later tonight. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer