From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2453 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2002 05:48:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2295 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2002 05:48:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO twigboy.cygnus.com) (205.180.230.45) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2002 05:48:54 -0000 Received: (from aldyh@localhost) by twigboy.cygnus.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id g1M5mnG29946; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 21:48:49 -0800 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 21:48:00 -0000 From: Aldy Hernandez To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Aldy Hernandez , gdb@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, rth@redhat.com Subject: Re: rfc: DW_AT_vector Message-ID: <20020221214849.A29943@twigboy.cygnus.com> Reply-To: aldyh@redhat.com References: <20020222041007.GA2446@redhat.com> <15477.55000.987400.13875@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15477.55000.987400.13875@localhost.redhat.com>; from ezannoni@redhat.com on Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 12:27:52AM -0500 X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 > > of course, i'm willing to volunteer to code the DW_TAG_vector_type > > stuff, but only as a last and painful resort :). > > > > This would work, yes, even though I would personally prefer to have a > new vector type. It represents more closely what these vectors really > are. > why can't you achieve the functionality with DW_AT_vector? it has the added benefit that other debuggers can read vectors quite intuitively. aldy