From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12651 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2002 18:16:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12546 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 18:16:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 18:16:48 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id SAA03257; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 18:13:51 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma011332; Tue, 19 Feb 02 17:45:17 GMT Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA08910; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 17:45:16 GMT Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA29591; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 17:45:15 GMT Message-Id: <200202191745.RAA29591@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Eli Zaretskii cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: ARI and DUP filenames In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:22:30 +0200." <6228-Tue19Feb2002192229+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:16:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00246.txt.bz2 > > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:16:04 +0000 > > From: Richard Earnshaw > > > > I've noticed that the ARI script is whingeing about armnbsd-tdep.c and > > armnbsd-nat.c having a common 8.3 filename representation. OK, but why > > doesn't it spot the fact that arm-linux-nat.c and arm-linux-tdep.c also > > have a common 8.3 format? > > Because the latter two (and quite a few others) are automatically > renamed when GDB is unpacked on DOS filesystems; see > gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst. To stop ARI's whining, add suitable > lines to fnchange.lst. Ah! Thank-you. Does this script go round fixing up all makefile etc references as well? Or do I have to add other definitions elsewhere for that? R.