From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9355 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2002 14:16:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9231 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 14:16:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 14:16:40 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id OAA25049; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:16:38 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma024328; Tue, 19 Feb 02 14:16:05 GMT Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA09398 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:16:05 GMT Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA09488; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:16:04 GMT Message-Id: <200202191416.OAA09488@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: ARI and DUP filenames Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 06:16:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 I've noticed that the ARI script is whingeing about armnbsd-tdep.c and armnbsd-nat.c having a common 8.3 filename representation. OK, but why doesn't it spot the fact that arm-linux-nat.c and arm-linux-tdep.c also have a common 8.3 format? R.