From: Piet/Pete Delaney <piet@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>, Piet Delaney <piet@sgi.com>,
gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: sid debugger interface extension: step out-of-range packet support
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020212222447.A25298@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C6A0365.4050207@cygnus.com>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 01:10:45AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Hi -
> >
> >A small amount of new code in sid/include and sid/component/gdb
> >now allows gdb's "step out-of-range" packet ('e'/'E') to work with
> >all sid-based simulator targets. This packet makes remote debugging
> >potentially significantly faster, because it can replace a sequence of
> >instruction single-step packets with just one new packet. This finally
> >exercises J.T. Conklin's gdb-side extensions from roughly a year ago.
> >
> >There is a gdb bug that is exposed by this support. If a breakpoint
> >placed on the current instruction, and another one on the next
> >source line, then letting gdb "step" will stop at the next line, but
> >won't let gdb realize that the second breakpoint was hit. (This is
> >because gdb never inserted the breakpoints in gdb/infrun.c's proceed(),
> >being unaware that remote_resume() meant something other than stepi.)
> >This looks like this is a minor problem, but just in case, support for
> >the packet may be forced off from the gdb side and/or from the sid side.
>
>
> Just to be clear. I wouldn't rely to much on that current packet and/or
> implementation. A number of issues with it have been pointed out with
> it. Suggest looking through the archives.
I found Frank more clear.
-piet
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-13 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-12 14:14 Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-02-12 22:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-12 22:24 ` Piet/Pete Delaney [this message]
2002-02-13 7:13 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2002-02-13 12:52 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-22 17:08 ` Michael Snyder
2002-02-22 17:05 ` Michael Snyder
2002-02-22 19:28 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020212222447.A25298@sgi.com \
--to=piet@sgi.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox