From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8677 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2002 02:05:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8494 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2002 02:05:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO duracef.shout.net) (204.253.184.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2002 02:05:00 -0000 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1B24xf08198 for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:04:59 -0600 Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:05:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200202110204.g1B24xf08198@duracef.shout.net> To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: When may I close a 5.1.1 PR? X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 So last week I filed this PR: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?database=gdb&cmd=view&pr=334 This is a test failure in 5.1.1, but it is fixed in gdb HEAD (the mainline). As a general question, when is a good time to close a PR that is fixed in the mainline but not in the 5.1 branches: . after gdb 5.2 is released? . after gdb 5.2 is branched? . as soon as the bug is fixed in mainline? I'll be happy to do whatever the voices in my mailbox tell me. :) Michael C