From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28446 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2002 04:46:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28367 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2002 04:46:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2002 04:46:52 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16Zlt6-0002Ns-00 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 23:46:52 -0500 Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 20:46:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Switch from gnats to Bugzilla? Message-ID: <20020209234652.A9148@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20020210042013.GA4884@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020210042013.GA4884@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00170.txt.bz2 On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 11:20:13PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > It looks like our gcc counterparts are migrating to Bugzilla. > > I was wondering if it would be a good time to switch gdb to Bugzilla, > too. > > IMO, Bugzilla is superior to GNATS. The interface is more intuitive > and it can even be linked to CVS (I believe). > > There is a long discussion of this subject here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-02/msg00454.html > > I'm willing to do the work if there is agreement that it is a good > thing. FWIW, I agree completely. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer