From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25226 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2002 16:57:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25125 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2002 16:57:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.3) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2002 16:57:31 -0000 Received: by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com; id QAA22727; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:57:29 GMT Received: from unknown(172.16.1.2) by fw-cam.cambridge.arm.com via smap (V5.5) id xma022339; Fri, 8 Feb 02 16:57:01 GMT Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA23426; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:57:00 GMT Received: from sun18.cambridge.arm.com (sun18.cambridge.arm.com [172.16.2.18]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA07314; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:57:00 GMT Message-Id: <200202081657.QAA07314@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Andrew Cagney cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: testsuite problems In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:47:30 EST." <3C640122.3020104@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 08:57:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 > > failed to get controlling terminal using TIOCSCTTYparent: sync byte write: > > broken pipe > > > BSD? > Yep. (NetBSD) > I've seen the message on FreeBSD and NetBSD systems and never been > able to track it down - re-running the testsuite made it disappear > :-( Hmm, well my shark has a fairly limited number of ptys (64), so with 200-odd failures by that point, it is plausible. R.