From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19576 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2002 00:41:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19472 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2002 00:41:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Feb 2002 00:41:25 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16Yccw-0005M6-00 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2002 19:41:26 -0500 Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 16:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: Change all users of file_frame_chain_valid to func_fraim_chain_valid Message-ID: <20020206194126.A20568@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20020206193844.A20335@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020206193844.A20335@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:38:44PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I can not think of any target, specifically, where we would want to default > to showing below main. We should certainly also add an option to enable > showing below main, but if main is present I can not see why we would want > to. Targets which really want to go all the way down seem to use nonnull_* > instead of file_*. > > Any comments? And to follow up to myself, this may also involve users of generic_*_valid. I don't see why some platforms want to explicitly allow call dummies and some don't; I suspect all the others implicitly allow them, since they are non-NULL and non-_start. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer