From: "Peter.Schauer" <Peter.Schauer@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de>
To: ezannoni@redhat.com
Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com, aoliva@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB cvs won't build on AIX 4.1
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 12:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200202042059.VAA27761@reaktor.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15454.51522.720684.688328@localhost.redhat.com>; from "Elena Zannoni" at Feb 4, 102 6:48 pm
-mminimal-toc is only available with gcc, so we might loose again, if someone
tries to build GDB with the native compiler. It might be worthwile to add
-mminimal-toc if we are using gcc though, for performance reasons.
I have not been suggesting to revert the patch, but I was thinking along the
lines of (completely untested):
# Do this only for native AIX builds
# The GNU linker does not understand the -bbigtoc switch, which the
# native linker needs.
hold_ldflags=$LDFLAGS
AC_MSG_CHECKING(for the ld -bbigtoc flag)
LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -Wl,-bbigtoc"
AC_TRY_LINK(, [int i;], nativeld=yes, nativeld=no)
LDFLAGS=$hold_ldflags
AC_MSG_RESULT($nativeld)
if test $nativeld = yes; then
CONFIG_LDFLAGS="${CONFIG_LDFLAGS} -Wl,-bbigtoc"
fi
in gdb/configure.in, adapted from a similar Solaris test, which should work
for all compiler/linker combinations.
> Andrew Cagney writes:
> > > On Feb 4, 2002, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>> Perhaps we should hard-code the link option -bbigtoc for gdb to
> > >>> link properly on AIX?
> > >
> > >
> > >> That was the problem. See gdb/294.
> > >> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=294
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the pointer. Would it be pointless then to post a patch
> > > that detected which version of GCC is in use, and whether the linker
> > > it uses accepts -bbigtoc?
> >
> >
> > The oposite! See Peter Schauer's comment - it would solve the problem.
> >
> > Andrew
>
> Sorry for the late reply, but there is another way to solve that
> problem which is to compile gdb passing the -mminimal-toc option to
> gcc. This should be uniformly OK independently of the linker used.
>
> There are also these options available, but I haven't tried them.
>
> -mfull-toc
> -mno-fp-in-toc
> -mno-sum-in-toc
>
>
> FWIW, using the GNU linker and reverting that patch I get this
> error: ../../powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0/bin/ld: invalid BFD target
> `bigtoc'collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> Elena
--
Peter Schauer pes@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-04 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-02 18:45 Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-03 18:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-04 4:15 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-02-04 8:06 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-04 9:47 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-02-04 12:59 ` Peter.Schauer [this message]
2002-02-24 5:10 ` Alexandre Oliva
2002-03-01 15:51 ` Peter.Schauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200202042059.VAA27761@reaktor.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de \
--to=peter.schauer@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox