From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29470 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2002 17:08:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29394 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2002 17:08:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2002 17:08:38 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16WhB8-0007B2-00; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 12:08:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 09:08:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Non-multiarched macros Message-ID: <20020201120846.A27564@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3C5AC1B2.50805@cygnus.com> <200202011703.RAA16938@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200202011703.RAA16938@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:03:51PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > > > ELF_MAKE_MSYMBOL_SPECIAL -- elfread.c > > > > REGISTER_BYTES_OK > > > > > COFF_MAKE_MSYMBOL_SPECIAL -- coffread.c > > > > REGISTER_BYTES_OK > > These two are my biggest concern. They are likely to pull object-format > specific information into the tdep file. Is that safe? Can I be sure > that the all the object formats will be available there, regardless of > configuration. Yep. All the standard formats - including at least ELF and COFF - will always be available, and no one really plans to change that. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer