From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27993 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2002 17:06:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27438 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2002 17:05:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2002 17:05:39 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16Wh7c-00078L-00; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 12:05:08 -0500 Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 09:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: George Helffrich +44 117 954 5437 , gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, law@redhat.com Subject: Re: Debug info for 'complex' types Message-ID: <20020201120508.A27280@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , George Helffrich +44 117 954 5437 , gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, law@redhat.com References: <200202011553.g11Frmh03425@olivine.geology.bristol.ac.uk> <3C5AC4C7.30207@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C5AC4C7.30207@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 11:39:35AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Daniel write: > > >Also note that the newer of your two compilers above - the Solaris 2.7 > >package is, I assume, newer - 'R' is used instead of 'r'. That'll be > >handled correctly in GDB whatever the outcome of this discussion (or at > >least separately). > > > Is there a reason to not copy sun? Well, I suppose there's no reason not to. Switching GCC 3 to that model would work, and be less ambiguous. Or we can just revert to past behavior for g77 and that will work too. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer