From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: George Helffrich +44 117 954 5437 <george@gly.bris.ac.uk>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com, law@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Debug info for 'complex' types
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 07:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020201102600.A9873@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200202011034.g11AYO002233@olivine.geology.bristol.ac.uk>
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:34:24AM +0000, George Helffrich +44 117 954 5437 wrote:
> I proposed this change also to fix complex value support in GDB (I use
> g77, gdb and complex arithmetic extensively in my line of work). My base
> version was GDB 4.16. (I can send you patches if you are interested.) After
> studying all stabs documentation I could find (with no particular illumination
> on the issue of complex types), I also compared stabs output from other
> Fortran compilers available to me. Here they are:
>
> >From Solaris 2.7 SC4.2 f77:
>
> .stabs "complex*8:t9=R3;8",32,0,0,0
>
> >From SunOS 4.1.3 f77:
>
> .stabs "complex:t7=r7;8;0;",0x20,0,0,0
>
> and with the patch I proposed for g77 (2.95.2 19991024 release, patched):
>
> .stabs "complex float:t(0,16)=r(0,16);8;0;",128,0,0,0
>
> I think this indicates the length should be 8 for a single precision complex
> value. If you want gdb to even think about supporting Sun Fortran compiler
> stabs (my gdb tries to do so), *don't* withdraw this patch. Tell your users
> to recompile if they want to debug code with complex arithmetic.
No, I'm sorry, that's not acceptable logic. You broke compatibility
with released 2.95.x; 'fixing' GDB for it would break support for that
version of g77.
Also note that the newer of your two compilers above - the Solaris 2.7
package is, I assume, newer - 'R' is used instead of 'r'. That'll be
handled correctly in GDB whatever the outcome of this discussion (or at
least separately).
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-01 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-01 2:34 George Helffrich +44 117 954 5437
2002-02-01 7:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-01 7:53 George Helffrich +44 117 954 5437
2002-02-01 8:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-02-01 9:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-30 20:26 Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020201102600.A9873@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=george@gly.bris.ac.uk \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox