From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2324 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2002 19:11:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2030 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2002 19:11:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2002 19:11:13 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16Vdf4-0000cX-00 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:11:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:11:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Obsolete WinCE target Message-ID: <20020129141118.A2232@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3C56EA2A.1060902@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C56EA2A.1060902@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:30:02PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-01/msg00362.html > > Neither GCC or BINUTILS can generate PC code so retaining support in GDB > isn't useful. If someone would like to update the PE support then a > previously released GDB can be used as a reference point. In case it throws anyone else for a loop when they read this: Replace "PC code" there with "WinCE code". We even do support PE on one of the Windows or DOS targets, don't we? -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer