From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25141 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2002 02:03:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25100 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2002 02:03:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2002 02:03:45 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16SToF-0005to-00 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 21:03:43 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:03:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Profiling gdb? Message-ID: <20020120210343.A22638@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00225.txt.bz2 What was the final status of the profiling patch? It's a feature I'd really like to see in (having it in means fewer local changes in my tree when I'm testing the speed of something!). -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer