From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20674 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2002 23:10:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20622 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2002 23:10:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2002 23:10:01 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16RLfT-0000mV-00; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:09:59 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 15:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Daniel Berlin Cc: Petr Sorfa , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Upcoming DWARF 3 and FORTRAN95 patches for 5.1.1 or 5.2? Message-ID: <20020117180959.A2987@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Berlin , Petr Sorfa , gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <20020117175624.A2265@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00198.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:06:11PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 05:03:14PM -0500, Petr Sorfa wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'll be releasing several patches soon, starting with some DWARF III > > > support next week (I hope) and FORTRAN95 starting in March. > > > > > > Just curious as to what timeline these patches will fit in (once they > > > are accepted.) The DWARF III I see making the 5.1.1 tree, but the > > > FORTRAN95 patches? > > > > Nothing's going to make 5.1.1. It's far too late; it'll be released in > > a week, if I understood Andrew correctly. > > > > Can you be more specific - what parts of DWARF3? I've been working on > > the dwarf2 reader in my spare time, and I'm willing to bet you'll > > clobber all of those patches, so it would be nice if you fixed what I > > was working on :P > > I would imagine, based on reading some stuff on Intel's web site (that > said they were having caldera modify gdb for them to support their > compiler's debug output), that he's adding the pieces needed to support > Intel's C++ Compiler for Linux. > > I have a list of what that outputs that gdb doesn't currently supports > somewhere, but it might be easier for you to just look yourself, as it > would take me a while to find it. If you have a chance to find it, I'd appreciate it. Otherwise I'll wait for Petr; I'm swamped. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer