From: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@gnat.com>
To: ac131313@cygnus.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: More code code dropping
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2001 00:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011208081530.BC4D8F28C6@nile.gnat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C10E386.2070809@cygnus.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Fri, 07 Dec 2001 10:43:02 -0500)
Folks,
In discussing with Andrew Cagney the proper procedure for depositing ACT's
Ada-related changes to GDB, I raised the question of what the most useful
patch would be (or if it matters). Inasmuch as ACT's current GDB sources
are derived from the GDB 5.0 release from spring 2000, last re-merged
in September 2000, I thought that a diff against the gdb 5.0 release
was probably most useful. Andrew had suggested a patch against the
latest, bleeding-edge changes. Since the idea of a diff is to give the
curious some idea of our changes, it seemed to me that the latter diff would
show mostly undoings of more recent changes to GDB. If anyone else out
there has an opinion on this subject, I'd like to hear it.
Paul Hilfinger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-08 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@gnat.com>
2001-11-29 0:59 ` Huge Apple gdb code dropping^H^H^H^H Jason Molenda
2001-11-24 6:24 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-25 0:39 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-29 11:12 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-29 13:34 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-25 9:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-25 9:42 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-29 13:43 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-25 9:47 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-11-29 14:15 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-11-29 7:29 ` David Relson
2001-11-24 12:36 ` David Relson
2001-11-29 10:27 ` Stan Shebs
2001-11-25 0:36 ` Stan Shebs
2001-11-29 11:25 ` Jason Molenda
2001-11-25 1:24 ` Jason Molenda
[not found] ` <200112070641.WAA01521@localhost.localdomain>
2001-12-08 18:05 ` More code code dropping Jason Molenda
[not found] ` <3C10E0F3.2010607@cygnus.com>
2001-12-07 7:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-08 0:17 ` Paul Hilfinger [this message]
2001-12-08 7:56 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-12-08 11:05 ` David Relson
2001-12-08 15:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-13 5:27 ` Paul N. Hilfinger
2001-12-15 11:32 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011208081530.BC4D8F28C6@nile.gnat.com \
--to=hilfingr@gnat.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox