From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28218 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2001 01:18:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28002 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2001 01:18:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2001 01:18:23 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16B4Eb-0002Se-00 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2001 20:18:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 17:18:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: [testsuite/c++] Why is there one fail in demangle.exp? Message-ID: <20011203201857.A9412@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 The test is: drow@nevyn:~% c++filt __thunk_64__0RL__list__Q29CosNaming20_proxy_NamingContextUlRPt25_CORBA_Unbounded_Sequence1ZQ29CosNaming7BindingRPQ29CosNaming15BindingIterator virtual function thunk (delta:-64) for CosNaming::_proxy_NamingContext::_0RL__list(unsigned long, _CORBA_Unbounded_Sequence *&, CosNaming::BindingIterator *&) I can see that being wrong (_0RL__list as a function name is a little suspicious). But the test expects "Can't demangle". Anyone know if it is right or wrong? I'll add a clarifying comment. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer