From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: David Relson <relson@osagesoftware.com>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Problem with threaded program
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 15:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011202184904.B7998@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C0A7599.3040902@cygnus.com>
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 01:40:25PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Greetings,
> >
> >The problem below was originally reported to the Linux Kernel Mailing List.
> >It looks to me to be a gdb problem.
> >
> >I used a freshly compiled and installed copy of gdb-5.1 (configured as
> >"i686-pc-linux-gnu") for this test on a Pentium III 500mhz running the
> >2.4.16 kernel. The same problem happens with gdb-5.0. gdb-4.18 appears to
> >work fine.
> >
> >Here's the test program, test.c:
> >
> >#include <stdlib.h>
> >int main() {
> > char *t="1.0";
> > double d=0;
> > d=strtod(t,(char **)NULL);
> > printf( "%f\n", d );
> > return 0;
> >}
> >
> >Build using "gcc -g -lpthread test.c"; run using "gdb a.out".
> >
> >If you step through the program one line at a time and display variable d
> >after each assignment, the strtod() call seems to return
> >"nan(0x8000000000000)", which is also shown by print().
> >
> >If you restart the program with a breakpoint at printf(), let it run, and
> >display d at the breakpoint, the value shown is "1.000000" which is
> >correct.
> >
> >Is this a defect in gdb, or is my analysis wrong?
>
> Ah, looks like the GDB is corrupting a threaded programs FP registers
> problem.
>
> I'm 99% certain this is in the thread-db/kernel interface that GDB is
> using. Each time this crops up, the problem gets resolved with a
> kernel/library update.
>
> If someone can point out a definitive explination I'll add it to the
> 5.1.1 PROBLEMS file. That way it is at least clearly documented.
>
> The apparent 4.18 -> 5.0 ``breakage'' would have occured because GDB
> switched to using the thread-db/kernel interface.
Well, it happens every time we try to step over an fstpl instruction.
We never call any of the SETREGS or POKE variants, only GETREGS and
GETFPXREGS; I don't see how it could really be our bug.
Note that in the non-threaded case we never call PTRACE_GETFPXREGS at
all. That's:
- an inefficency in the thread code, not surprisingly
- highly suggestive of a kernel bug.
My money's on the kernel, but I don't have time to debug this just now.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-02 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <David Relson <relson@osagesoftware.com>
2001-12-02 8:44 ` David Relson
2001-12-02 10:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-02 15:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2001-12-02 17:24 ` David Relson
2001-12-02 21:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-03 4:14 ` David Relson
2001-12-03 7:49 ` Trond Eivind Glomsrød
2001-12-06 16:04 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-12-06 16:37 ` David Relson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011202184904.B7998@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=relson@osagesoftware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox