From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: C++ debugging progress
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:11:00 -0000
Message-ID: <1011129210958.ZM19300@ocotillo.lan>
References: <20011128020256.A9688@nevyn.them.org> <wvl667v1btw.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <20011128124118.A23447@nevyn.them.org> <wvly9kqy98q.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <wvlbshmy5fb.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <20011128163159.A3256@nevyn.them.org> <wvllmgplbip.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com> <20011129152709.A9719@nevyn.them.org> <drow@mvista.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00344.html
Message-ID: <20011129131100.YC2PxmPgYk3gGnoJzz66SO3BFdwPwj7hIo5qvWbrz3k@z>

On Nov 29,  3:27pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 05:42:06PM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> > 
> > > Any chance of getting this into 3.0.3 also
> > 
> > The change seems to make things worse with gdb 5.1, so I'm not sure that
> > would be a good idea.
> 
> To be honest, I'd rather the patch go in anyway.  C++ debugging for v3
> is so broken in gdb 5.1 that it does not make a lot of sense to cater
> to it.

FWIW, I agree with Daniel.  There's been talk of a possible gdb 5.1.1. 
I'd be all in favor of Daniel's C++ fixes going into 5.1.1 if Jason's
fixes go into a mainline gcc version.

Kevin