From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gdb@thewrittenword.com To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 5.1 ERRATA file? Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 05:03:00 -0000 Message-id: <20011127070345.A43139@oolong.il.thewrittenword.com> References: <3C033A28.50209@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00287.html On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:41:03AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > Something I noticed from the feedback so far is that it is hard to know > > what problems a release will have - they are burried in the file > > gdb/README. What do people think of them being moved to the file > > gdb/ERRATA? > > I suggest gdb/PROBLEMS or even (gasp) gdb/BUGS. Emacs has PROBLEMS. -- albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6340 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2001 13:03:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6301 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 13:03:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail1.thewrittenword.com) (206.137.36.130) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 2001 13:03:46 -0000 Received: (from china@localhost) by mail1.thewrittenword.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) id fARD3j343186 for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 07:03:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from gdb@thewrittenword.com) From: gdb@thewrittenword.com Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 08:54:00 -0000 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 5.1 ERRATA file? Message-ID: <20011127070345.A43139@oolong.il.thewrittenword.com> Reply-To: gdb@sources.redhat.com References: <3C033A28.50209@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:41:03AM +0200 X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2 Message-ID: <20011117085400.MFtF497w0vJ48lTxDMEbs0GEMv9xhu5FbGyvNAYIs7U@z> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:41:03AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > Something I noticed from the feedback so far is that it is hard to know > > what problems a release will have - they are burried in the file > > gdb/README. What do people think of them being moved to the file > > gdb/ERRATA? > > I suggest gdb/PROBLEMS or even (gasp) gdb/BUGS. Emacs has PROBLEMS. -- albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com)