Re: 5.1 ERRATA file?

David Relson
2001-11-27T06:47:00Z

At 02:00 AM 11/27/01, Andrew Cagney wrote:

>Something I noticed from the feedback so far is that it is hard to know
>what problems a release will have - they are burried in the file
>gdb/README. What do people think of them being moved to the file
>gdb/ERRATA? Then again, the GNU coding standard might override such an
>idea :-/

Andrew,

I like the idea. The name ERRATA is clear and, as with all files with
all-caps in their names, it stands out in a directory listing.

David