Re: 5.1 ERRATA file?

Andrew Cagney
2001-11-28T07:15:20Z

> On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 09:41:03AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>
>
>> > Something I noticed from the feedback so far is that it is hard to know
>> > what problems a release will have - they are burried in the file
>> > gdb/README. What do people think of them being moved to the file
>> > gdb/ERRATA?
>
>>
>> I suggest gdb/PROBLEMS or even (gasp) gdb/BUGS.
>
>
> Emacs has PROBLEMS.

Hmm, while I prefer ERRATA, I'm never one to pass up an oportunity that
lets me use EMACS as the rationale for a decision. -> PROBLEMS (ulgh).

Again?

I think BUGS would be confusing. A problem might be caused by several
bugs -> HP/UX.

Andrew