From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Relson <relson@osagesoftware.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: 5.1 ERRATA file?
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 06:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20011127094533.00b39dc0@mail.osagesoftware.com>
References: <3C033A28.50209@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00289.html
Message-ID: <20011127064700._ioOE6CvaMuG2hSvCIvmkzksBL1Cbe1TgBdPJJiu7OU@z>

At 02:00 AM 11/27/01, Andrew Cagney wrote:

>Something I noticed from the feedback so far is that it is hard to know 
>what problems a release will have - they are burried in the file 
>gdb/README.  What do people think of them being moved to the file 
>gdb/ERRATA?  Then again, the GNU coding standard might override such an 
>idea :-/

Andrew,

I like the idea.  The name ERRATA is clear and, as with all files with 
all-caps in their names, it stands out in a directory listing.

David