From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Cc: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>, Mark Kettenis <kettenis@science.uva.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] fix  cygwin GDB "long long" return value error
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 21:33:00 -0000
Message-id: <20011012003434.A22626@redhat.com>
References: <3.0.6.32.20011004012430.010f56b0@idefix.wisa.be> <4.2.0.58.20011005095752.00d0db60@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <20011010221023.B13834@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00116.html

On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:10:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:00:09PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
>>Could someone, (Christopher ?) explains us why tm-cygwin.h includes
>>tm-i386v.h when as Mark Kettenis said, Cygwin is not derived from
>>System V ?
>
>I am sorry but I really can't explain why tm-cygwin.h includes
>tm-i386v.h.  I believe that predates my maintainership.
>
>However, if you have tested your patch and everything works fine,
>please check it in.  I've verified that gdb seems to work ok
>but I haven't run it through the test suite.

Nevermind.  I just checked this in.

Thanks,
cgf