From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads?
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010919084300.B30131@lucon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2110-Wed19Sep2001104344+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:43:45AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 13:55:55 -0700
> > From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
> >
> > BTW, people may be very disappointed at the current Linuxthreads
> > support in gdb 5.1.
>
> I wonder why was it necessary to make such a comment. It doesn't add
> any technical information to what you already posted, but it might
> discourage people from working on fixing the problems.
That is the very first response I got for all my messages on this. Does
it tell anything? FYI, my users told me the new gdb was broken for them
and wanted to go back to the old one.
>
> Can we please stay technical and deviod of any unfriendly attitude?
> Saying that such and such feature doesn't work is all people need to
> try to fix the problem.
I thought noone cared about it. Let's fix the bug.
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-19 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-17 12:47 H . J . Lu
[not found] ` <20010917161350.A25349@lucon.org>
2001-09-17 19:13 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-18 13:56 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-18 15:22 ` RFC: Fix gdb 5.1 for Linuxthreads H . J . Lu
2001-09-19 5:42 ` Duncan Palmer
2001-09-19 9:19 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-20 8:21 ` Duncan Palmer
2001-09-19 7:06 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-09-19 8:58 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-19 0:46 ` Is the current gdb 5.1 broken for Linuxthreads? Eli Zaretskii
2001-09-19 8:43 ` H . J . Lu [this message]
2001-09-19 6:56 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-09-19 7:39 ` Eric Paire
2001-09-19 9:05 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-20 0:59 ` Eric Paire
2001-09-19 13:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-09-20 1:36 ` Eric Paire
2001-09-20 8:03 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-20 21:49 ` Eric Paire
2001-09-19 9:10 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-19 6:32 ` Mark Kettenis
2001-09-19 9:16 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-21 2:27 James Cownie
2001-09-21 5:04 ` Eric Paire
2001-09-21 5:25 ` James Cownie
2001-09-21 8:35 ` H . J . Lu
2001-09-21 8:39 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010919084300.B30131@lucon.org \
--to=hjl@lucon.org \
--cc=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox