From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
To: GDB <gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: Print 64bit address from gdb
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:21:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010810112116.A10420@lucon.org>
References: <20010809161153.A25494@lucon.org> <20010809163140.A6995@nevyn.them.org> <20010810094110.B8606@lucon.org> <20010810104131.A9087@nevyn.them.org>
X-SW-Source: 2001-08/msg00111.html

On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 10:41:31AM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > 
> > > Yes, that's a problem.  Perhaps you can use your conveniently introduced
> > > *printf_vma functions for this?
> > 
> > It should use 
> > 
> > {"inner block (%s-%s) not inside outer block (%s-%s)", 0, 0};
> > 
> > and use
> > 
> > sprintf_vma/bfd_sprintf_vma. bfd_sprintf_vma is better for user and
> > sprintf_vma may be better for developer. I prefer bfd_sprintf_vma.
> 
> I assume that bfd_sprintf_vma is the one which will truncate to 32bit
> in a 32bit BFD?

No, it truncates to 32bit for 32bit ELF.

> 
> If so, please use sprintf_vma instead.  These are debugging error
> messages; they are primarily of interest to the developers.

Either way is fine with me.


H.J.