From: Brian Grant <grant@transmeta.com>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: support for compilation units with discontiguous address ranges? (.debug_ranges)
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200107192155.OAA10252@grant-linux2.transmeta.com> (raw)
Has anyone implemented dwarf2 support in gdb for compilation units with
discontiguous ranges of addresses? gcc 3.x doesn't seem to produce
.debug_ranges and gdb 5.0 doesn't read it at all. gdb also seems to
ignore .debug_aranges.
What I've tried to do is to put different functions in the same C file into
different text sections using gcc as follows:
foobar.c:
__attribute__((section(".text1"))) void foo() {...}
__attribute__((section(".text2"))) void bar() {...}
In the executable, they are located something like:
Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
...
2 .text1 0000a688 00ec5800 00ec5800 000001b4 2**10
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE
3 .text2 0000ee58 00ed5800 00ed5800 0000a83c 2**10
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE
...
What currently happens in gdb is that all functions in .text1
and .text2 at addresses between foo() and bar() are attributed
the file and line number of the last line of foo(). Their real,
accurate line-number info is overshadowed completely.
I noticed that gcc doesn't produce DW_AT_low_pc/high_pc fields for
foobar.c, as it normally would for a DW_TAG_compilation_unit record,
where all functions in the compilation unit were in the same section.
Does anyone know of a workaround for this problem?
--Brian Grant
Transmeta Corp.
next reply other threads:[~2001-07-19 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-19 14:56 Brian Grant [this message]
2001-07-20 14:30 ` Jim Blandy
2001-07-20 19:14 ` Daniel Berlin
2001-07-21 8:53 ` Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200107192155.OAA10252@grant-linux2.transmeta.com \
--to=grant@transmeta.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox