From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Cc: ac131313@cygnus.com
Subject: DOS/Windows-specific code: inflow.c
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 04:43:00 -0000
Message-id: <200105081145.OAA06214@is.elta.co.il>
References: <20010503211502.21716.qmail@web6401.mail.yahoo.com> <3AF1DAA0.3060702@cygnus.com> <200105071609.TAA24129@is.elta.co.il>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00103.html

    * inflow.c:new_tty()

    #if !defined(__GO32__) && !defined(_WIN32)
    #ifdef TIOCNOTTY
      /* Disconnect the child process from our controlling terminal.  On some
	 systems (SVR4 for example), this may cause a SIGTTOU, so temporarily
	 ignore SIGTTOU. */
      tty = open ("/dev/tty", O_RDWR);
      if (tty > 0)
	{
	  void (*osigttou) ();

	  osigttou = (void (*)()) signal (SIGTTOU, SIG_IGN);
	  ioctl (tty, TIOCNOTTY, 0);
	  close (tty);
	  signal (SIGTTOU, osigttou);
	}
    #endif

      /* Now open the specified new terminal.  */

    #ifdef USE_O_NOCTTY
      tty = open (inferior_thisrun_terminal, O_RDWR | O_NOCTTY);
    #else
      tty = open (inferior_thisrun_terminal, O_RDWR);
    #endif
      if (tty == -1)
	{
	  print_sys_errmsg (inferior_thisrun_terminal, errno);
	  _exit (1);
	}

This code assumes too many Posix features.  Should we define
NO_NEW_TTY?


    * inflow.c: pass_signal() [and many more functions that call kill()]

    /* ARGSUSED */
    static void
    pass_signal (int signo)
    {
    #ifndef _WIN32
      kill (PIDGET (inferior_pid), SIGINT);
    #endif
    }

I don't really understand why does the Windows build need to ifdef
away the calls to kill.  In any case, it sounds like providing a no-op
version in win32-nat.c would be a better idea.