Re: DOS/Windows-specific code: values.c

Andrew Cagney
2001-05-10T08:33:00Z

> On May 8, 2:55pm, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>
>> * values.c:unpack_double()
>>
>> /* Unsigned -- be sure we compensate for signed LONGEST. */
>> #if !defined (_MSC_VER) || (_MSC_VER > 900)
>> return (ULONGEST) unpack_long (type, valaddr);
>> #else
>> /* FIXME!!! msvc22 doesn't support unsigned __int64 -> double */
>> return (LONGEST) unpack_long (type, valaddr);
>> #endif /* _MSC_VER */
>>
>> There's _got_ to be a better way to do this!
>
>
> Is this even an issue any longer? I.e, is the version of MSC being
> catered to by the above ifdefs still in widespread use?

To follow up Chris's comment. Yes, the code is dead but for a different
reason. This is probably yet another hang over from WinGDB.

Andrew