From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@delorie.com>
To: cgf@redhat.com
Cc: sb@metis.no, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Which version of gdb supports gcc 3.0 ABI?
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:59:00 -0000
Message-id: <200103161008.FAA14750@indy.delorie.com>
References: <200103131956.f2DJuCT31263@fillmore.constant.com> <m2wv9tv0a7.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu> <20010314132500.D6148@disaster.jaj.com> <20010314212236.A28674@redhat.com> <m2elvzhfgy.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu> <200103150907.EAA27838@indy.delorie.com> <whvgpavpg6.fsf@viffer.computas.no> <20010315152127.A4790@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00146.html

> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:21:27 -0500
> From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
> 
> I also again suggest that rather than jump up and down talking about
> forks, go over to the gdb mailing lists and read about what is going
> on.  Then you can draw opinions based on facts.

Seconded.