From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com>
To: ac131313@cygnus.com
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: CVS versions of gdb have same number as stable version.
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:59:00 -0000
Message-id: <200103051739.JAA18572@bosch.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00034.html

Andrew Cagney suggests:

>   trunk: gdb-5.1-20054705
>   5.1 branch: gdb-5.0.99, gdb-5.1 (tag), gdb-5.1.0.90, ...

Anything that is not "5.0" works for me.

I like having both a version number and a date in it.  I would also
like "-cvs" for versions built out of CVS pulls (as opposed to
releases and snapshots).

> So again, to restart this discussion .... :-)  Comments?

If the discussion comes to a conclusion, it would be helpful to record
the conclusion in PR gdb/22 as a spec for someone to do the work.

My two cents,

Michael