From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
To: eliz@is.elta.co.il
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Register cache
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 03:19:00 -0000
Message-id: <200102171119.f1HBJgj00299@delius.kettenis.local>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010212092158.12969C-100000@is> <200102121753.f1CHr9t11723@rtl.cygnus.com> <200102121837.NAA07780@indy.delorie.com> <200102162321.f1GNL9q08272@delius.kettenis.local> <200102170828.DAA19374@indy.delorie.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00248.html

   Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 03:28:37 -0500 (EST)
   From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@delorie.com>

   > Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 00:21:09 +0100
   > From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@wins.uva.nl>
   > 
   > How about the attached patch?  Just give a yell and I'll check it in
   > 
   > Mark
   > 
   > 
   > Index: ChangeLog
   > from  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>
   > 
   >	* i387-nat.c: Use regnum instead of regno consistently.  Fix
   >	comments accordingly.
   >	(i387_supply_register): New function.
   >	(i387_supply_fsave): Implement using i387_supply_register.
   >	* i387-nat.h: Use regnum instead of regno consistently.  Fix
   >	comments accordingly.

   How can I say anything but "YES, PLEASE!" ?  It's almost the exact
   patch I suggested ;-)

Yeah! Basically I only changed the name of the function and the order
of the paramaters such that it more closely resembles the signature of
supply_register().  And I took the opportunity to sneak in some
gratuitious changes :-).  Anyway, it's checked in now.

Mark