From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com>
To: gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com, mschalit@pacbell.net
Subject: Re: GDB 5.0 testsuite failures
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 22:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200102110638.WAA17322@bosch.cygnus.com> (raw)
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for posting this. I appreciate seeing gdb test results from diverse
architectures.
Summary: this gdb looks healthy to me. There is one major bug:
if the user uses gdb to call a function in the target program, and that
function has floating point parameters or a floating point return value,
the call will not work.
There are probably some more minor bugs but I can't tell from the gdb.sum
file.
BTW, please note that the test run produces a "gdb.sum" file and a "gdb.log"
file. The "gdb.log" file has a lot more information and it's a better file
to put up for ftp, rather than capturing the output of "make check".
Michael Elizabeth Chastain
<chastain@redhat.com>
"love without fear"
ERROR: 26
23 errors in gdb.stabs/weird.exp
These look harmless; your assembler does not like .stabs directives.
3 errors from 'make' at the end of the run
More fluff.
WARNING: 3
1 warning in gdb.base/corefile.exp
'can't generate a core file' -- does not look like a gdb problem
2 warnings in gdb.stabs/weird.exp
Yeah, we know it doesn't like stabs.
FAIL: 224
190 fails in gdb.stabs/weird.exp
Will this test case shut up already?!
7 fails in gdb.base/callfwmall.exp
These are all related to calling functions with floating point
parameters or floating point return values. This looks like a
real bug in gdb.
7 fails in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp
These are all related to calling functions with floating point
parameters or floating point return values. This looks like a
real bug in gdb.
5 fails in gdb.c++/ovldbreak.exp
I would need to see gdb.log to tell whether this is a real bug or not.
3 fails in gdb.threads/pthreads.exp
Compiler can't find pthreads library so all these tests fail.
2 fails in gdb.base/commands.exp
One of these is a known bug in the test script (gnats gdb/14).
The other looks like a bug in gdb.
2 fails in gdb.base/break.exp
I don't know anything about these failures.
1 fail in gdb.base/varargs.exp
This is another call-to-function with floating point parameters.
1 fail in gdb.base/signals.exp
This is marked as 'known SV4 bug'. It may mean that 'next' will
not work on your machine and we can't fix it.
1 fail in gdb.base/selftest.exp
I don't know anything about this failure.
1 fail in gdb.base/interrupt.exp
I don't know anything about this failure.
1 fail in gdb.base/annota1.exp
I don't know anything about this failure.
next reply other threads:[~2001-02-10 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-10 22:38 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
2001-02-11 18:58 ` Matt Schalit
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-02-11 19:19 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-02-12 0:39 ` Matt Schalit
2001-02-10 19:55 Matt Schalit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200102110638.WAA17322@bosch.cygnus.com \
--to=chastain@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com \
--cc=mschalit@pacbell.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox