Re: Dejagnu as part of repository?

[Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>]

>  > A user wanting to run GDB tests could then just check out ``gdb
>  > dejagnu'' and build instantly and run the tests.  I figure that while
>  > dejagnu is a separate product the way GDB uses it is very like READLINE
>  > in that it is imported and then locked in.
>  > 
>  > Thoughts?  Clearly there is the need to ensure that it is kept in sync
>  > with GCC.
>You've got my vote.
>
>Actually there is no sync problem since GCC doesn't have dejagnu in its
>CVS repo.
>
>Looking further out it is my opinion that we should be looking to move
>more towards a single CVS repository for all these projects.

  But don't have readline and dejagnu have different  maintainers that 
might be of different opinions ?


Pierre Muller
Institut Charles Sadron
6,rue Boussingault
F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France)
mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr
Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07  Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99
From law@cygnus.com Thu Oct 28 04:51:00 1999
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Dejagnu as part of repository? 
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 04:51:00 -0000
Message-id: <24919.941110772@upchuck>
References: <199910281155.NAA20024@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
X-SW-Source: 1999-q4/msg00182.html
Content-length: 410

  In message < 199910281155.NAA20024@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr >you write:
  >   But don't have readline and dejagnu have different  maintainers that 
  > might be of different opinions ?
dejagnu doesn't use readline.  Just tcl & expect.  Neither tcl nor expect
is hosted by sourceware.cygnus.com, so they're not an issue.

I'm only talking about projects that are physically hosted on
sourceware.cygnus.com

jeff