From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Todd Sabin <tastas@home.com>
To: toddpw@wrs.com (Todd Whitesel)
Cc: tastas@home.com (Todd Sabin), gdb@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: keeping commands out of the history 
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <199903062326.SAA17173@banzai3.insignia.org>
References: <199903062315.PAA12479@alabama.wrs.com>
X-SW-Source: 1999-q1/msg00095.html

Todd Whitesel wrote:
> > Currently, if I type 'next' at the gdb prompt, it gets executed and my
> > hooks do, e.g., 'info registers', and put the output in a different buffer.
> > If I then type '<RET>' at the gdb prompt, it runs 'info registers' again,
> > not 'next'.  I want to it run 'next'.
> 
> Perhaps what you really want is for _hooks_ to be kept out of the value
> history. That sounds to me like a good thing, if it isn't already true.
> 

Well, when I say hooks, I mean hooks in emacs; I'm not sure if that was clear.
As far as gdb knows, they're normal commands.


Todd