From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23326 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2009 21:55:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 23317 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2009 21:55:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx.southnet.co.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:55:18 +0000 Received: from totara (15.26.255.123.static.snap.net.nz [123.255.26.15]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE11D3DA666; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:55:15 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E50E5C167; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:55:14 +1300 (NZDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19160.60352.406552.989757@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:05:00 -0000 To: tromey@redhat.com Cc: Doug Evans , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Bugzilla In-Reply-To: References: <19157.8638.416762.707431@totara.tehura.co.nz> From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00278.txt.bz2 Tom Tromey writes: > >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: > > Doug> Hi. The mailing list web page says gdb-prs@sourceware.org is the list > Doug> to use, though there's still a problem as the archives only have one > Doug> message from 2004. Heh. > Doug> http://sourceware.org/gdb/mailing-lists/ > > Yeah, something is screwy with the archive. > I haven't investigated it. > > Doug> I like the idea of a separate list. > > The mail actually does go to gdb-prs. > Or you can read it in gmane as gmane.comp.gdb.bugs.discuss. I don't think it actually goes to gdb-prs. The Reply-To: header is sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org while the To: header is gdb-prs@sourceware.org. I hit 'reply' in VM which goes to bugzilla. If I hit 'followup' which tries to go to both addresses, the message gets sent back to me. This would explain why there is only one message in gdb-prs. In any case, my point is that GDB Bugzilla is a bit of a black hole: more goes in than comes out. If reports did go to gdb-prs, they would still go unread as presumably no-one is subscribed to it. gdb and gdb-patches are the only mailing lists that appear to be widely read. -- Nick http://users.snap.net.nz/~nickrob