From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5645 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2009 01:04:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 5637 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jul 2009 01:04:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,BOTNET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:04:02 +0000 Received: from totara (unknown [123.255.28.143]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6223DA111; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:03:59 +1200 (NZST) Received: by totara (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 990B1C14D; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 13:03:58 +1200 (NZST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19023.64510.580104.314445@totara.tehura.co.nz> Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:04:00 -0000 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: annota1.exp In-Reply-To: <200907042030.n64KUxnJ025659@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> > but the expect pattern checks for the "frames-invalid" and "starting" > lines in reverse order: > > > -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\nContinuing with signal SIGUSR1.\r\n\r\n\032\032starting\(\r\n\r\n\032\032frames-invalid\)+ > > > Are people seeing the same thing on other platforms? > From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 I don't see this on x86_64-linux-gnu. FWIW, Emacs doesn't use the frames-invalid annotation. It, along with the breakpoints-invalid annotation, fires far too frequently. Emacs uses a reduced set of annotations, which we called level 3, created back in about 2004 when Andrew Cagney was release manager. The plan was to remove those which weren't in that set and I did submit a patch to do this (http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-06/msg00189.html). If maintenance of these tests becomes a burden people might like to reconsider this option. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob