Re: MI varobj artificial fields

André Pönitz
2008-04-16T15:35:04Z

On Wednesday 16 April 2008 17:20:01 Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Right now, when you're in C++ program and ask for children of a varobj
> that has structure type, you don't the the fields. Instead, you get
> "public", "private" and "protected" as chil dren.
> [...]
> So, I suggest to allow MI to optionally suppress those artificial fields.
> Comments?

I am very much in favour of having a possibility to suppress these artifical
fields.

Andre'