From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29874 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2008 11:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 29865 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Oct 2008 11:08:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:07:01 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (36.60.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.60.36]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBFA3D9FE2; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:06:58 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9431D8FC6D; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:06:54 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18688.23242.783095.562854@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:08:00 -0000 To: Denis PILAT Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Query user with gdb MI intepreter In-Reply-To: <49004FE5.6020807@st.com> References: <18688.7480.96669.634046@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <49004FE5.6020807@st.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.3.1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 > If actual behavior is not correct, then I will propose a simple patch > that is already in place in my version of gdb sources. I don't think anyone has considered how MI should behave after an internal error which really means there is a bug in GDB anyway. Why not just submit your patch for consideration? -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob