From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 429 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2007 05:54:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 415 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2007 05:54:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:54:48 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (18.61.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.61.18]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42673DA041; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 17:54:44 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F1B38FC6D; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 17:52:21 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18144.59157.93740.39520@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:11:00 -0000 To: Vladimir Prus Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI: "^running" issues In-Reply-To: <200709061046.21723.ghost@cs.msu.su> References: <200709041653.22357.ghost@cs.msu.su> <200709061046.21723.ghost@cs.msu.su> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 23.0.50.4 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 > > As another data point, the people who wrote the infrastructure for the > > async execution were two long-time and experienced GDB users and > > developers, and they obviously thought it was worth coding. > > This is argument by authority, I don't accept it. This style of argument is quite antagonistic especially when givien to those who are trying to help you. I'm not sure that you've demonstrated the need to remove the asynchronous code and the onus is on you to try to understand it, not on others to explain it to you. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob