From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12875 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2007 06:29:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 12866 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Sep 2007 06:29:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:29:21 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (153.61.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.61.153]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F22B3D9EA9; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:29:19 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B51B48FC6D; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 18:29:17 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18142.19645.46590.936933@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:29:00 -0000 To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: MI Development In-Reply-To: <200709050940.18839.ghost@cs.msu.su> References: <200709041740.22271.ghost@cs.msu.su> <18142.16140.486009.379849@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200709050940.18839.ghost@cs.msu.su> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 23.0.50.4 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 > > With asynchronous operation, asynchronous CLI commands give the same MI > > output that MI commands do. > > Why would I want to enable asynchronous operation for that to work? The > default behaviour is just broken, so even if --async fixes that, we should > not require any switches to get non-broken behaviour. My understanding is that currently GDB only operates synchronously (except perhaps with remote targets). -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob