From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26344 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2007 07:51:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 26336 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jun 2007 07:51:45 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:51:42 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (37.63.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.63.37]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704F03D90F9; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:51:38 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 63CC78FBF6; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:51:33 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18047.29700.556363.455690@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:51:00 -0000 To: Vladimir Prus Cc: kdevelop@kdevelop.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: 'continue' command problem In-Reply-To: <200706251101.54544.ghost@cs.msu.su> References: <200706041421.21962.leonp@plris.com> <200706251101.54544.ghost@cs.msu.su> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.1.50.5 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 > Nick, > I think your "async branch" is supposed to emit "^running" in all possible > cases. Is that the case, and if so, do you think that improvement can be > ported to gdb mainline quickly? I've abandoned the branch but have a much smaller patch that does something similar. It should emit all asynchronous records but I'm not sure what what happens inside a user-defined command. It's not really a quick fix for a specific problem but a different approach to a more general one. The patch is at: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00225.html and there has been more recent discussion about it on gdb-patches this month (Re: async patch (no. 4)). I have a working copy so I can send you a current patch privately if you want to try it out. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob