From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8326 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2007 00:44:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 8318 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2007 00:44:44 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 00:44:41 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (48.60.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.60.48]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F5F3D90F8; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:44:38 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 216188FBF6; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:44:27 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18045.48746.72550.756901@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 00:44:00 -0000 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: DELAYED: GDB 6.7 branch creation scheduled June 25th In-Reply-To: <20070623044559.GR18706@adacore.com> References: <20070621181530.GC12173@adacore.com> <18042.61938.458913.398215@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070622014101.GC18706@adacore.com> <18043.30976.871935.736190@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070622161752.GL18706@adacore.com> <18044.25556.843471.837917@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070623003622.GP18706@adacore.com> <18044.28720.838572.299857@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070623012330.GQ18706@adacore.com> <18044.31406.517675.362950@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070623044559.GR18706@adacore.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.1.50.4 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00227.txt.bz2 > In terms of learning from this thread: I interpreted your questions > as vague general questions and I couldn't understand the motivation > behind them. So I answered accordingly. Maybe I was naive, maybe I > misinterpreted. But it doesn't matter. What matters is that you know > how I operate, now. So if you tell us right from the beginning what > it is that you need, and why, we will answer your request a lot faster. Hopefully they weren't vague, but they were deliberately general because I thought there were others who wanted similar bugs resolved before the release, and I tried to suggest a policy for future releases too. As no one supported those ideas I moved to my specific issue. > > through this forum, hopefully to the attention of others. > > I'm sorry, but I think you're using the wrong communication channel. > Pinging the relevant parties on gdb-patches should be a lot more > effective. I thought gdb-patches was primarily for the submission of patches and gdb for more general matters. It's probably unimportant though, as I guess the global maintainers read both. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob