From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28216 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2007 01:43:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 28208 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2007 01:43:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:43:22 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (51.60.255.123.dynamic.snap.net.nz [123.255.60.51]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184783D99C5; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:43:19 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5596A8FBF6; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:43:11 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18044.31406.517675.362950@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:43:00 -0000 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: DELAYED: GDB 6.7 branch creation scheduled June 25th In-Reply-To: <20070623012330.GQ18706@adacore.com> References: <20070608061902.GP3761@adacore.com> <20070621181530.GC12173@adacore.com> <18042.61938.458913.398215@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070622014101.GC18706@adacore.com> <18043.30976.871935.736190@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070622161752.GL18706@adacore.com> <18044.25556.843471.837917@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070623003622.GP18706@adacore.com> <18044.28720.838572.299857@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070623012330.GQ18706@adacore.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.1.50.4 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 > > It's just the one that I left in the the message "So where's the gain in > > branching early?" but perhaps Stan Shebs answered it. > > And again, why are you saying that we're branching early? I think > I understand the real question now that you've mentioned the annotation > bug again. Perhaps I should have emhasised the words "where's the gain". That was my real question. Please don't be quite so cynical. >... > > My plan would be just revert the change and I think Jan Kratochvil has > > agreed with this. AFAICS there's no reason why this would delay the > > release. > > Sounds like a promising plan. But you are hammering at the wrong guy. > Keep pinging Jan and the maintainers that can approve the revert, > not me. I'm just drawing it to your attention as release manager and, through this forum, hopefully to the attention of others. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob