From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27026 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2006 20:29:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 26995 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Oct 2006 20:29:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:29:09 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-120-114.snap.net.nz [202.124.120.114]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519F57F2FB3; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:28:12 +1300 (NZDT) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id E06A3BE3EF; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:24:58 +1300 (NZDT) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17735.45334.494821.411911@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:29:00 -0000 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Testsuite failure (mi-var-child-f.exp) In-Reply-To: <20061031134444.GB17937@nevyn.them.org> References: <17735.3278.186623.731002@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20061031134444.GB17937@nevyn.them.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.90.4 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 > They won't tell you that; they're aware that gfortran's debug info is > mostly junk. Steven Bosscher has been working on it. It worked for g77, and I thought gfortran was a fork of that. Anyway are you saying there is little point in reporting it since there are many other problems with the debug info? Also how about my other point: Should the testuite find gfortran or is that a DajaGnu issue? -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob