From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20248 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2006 02:24:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 20235 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2006 02:24:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 02:24:48 +0000 Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p423-tnt1.snap.net.nz [202.124.111.169]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBEB76CC9E; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 14:24:48 +1200 (NZST) Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 24F6A1D3550; Sat, 24 Jun 2006 14:23:50 +1200 (NZST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17564.41525.309789.830784@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 02:26:00 -0000 To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Schedule proposal for the next release(s) In-Reply-To: <20060621074033.GF976@adacore.com> References: <20060621074033.GF976@adacore.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.22 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2 > Now that GDB 6.5 is out, here is what I propose in terms of the next > major release schedule (in all likeliness labled GDB 6.6). > > I would like to schedule the next release around begining of Dec 2006. > Working backwards, and substracting a month from it, it would mean that > we need to branch early Nov 2006. Allowing for unexpected problems, > let's give us another 2 weeks, that would mean actual branching date > around Oct 15. So I propose: > > * Branch : 16-OCT-2006 > * Pre-release : 06-NOV-2006 (3 weeks later) > * Release : 20-NOV-2006 (2 weeks after) If this is agreed I think it should be added to: http://sourceware.org/gdb/schedule/ which is already out of date. On a releated note, I think that http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/ need not mention dejagnu. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob