From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29602 invoked by alias); 8 May 2006 01:52:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 29581 invoked by uid 22791); 8 May 2006 01:52:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (HELO viper.snap.net.nz) (202.37.101.8) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 May 2006 01:52:51 +0000 Received: from farnswood.snap.net.nz (p202-124-115-253.snap.net.nz [202.124.115.253]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C3775866A; Mon, 8 May 2006 13:52:47 +1200 (NZST) Received: by farnswood.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1C01E627ED; Mon, 8 May 2006 02:52:09 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Roberts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17502.42056.466500.495231@farnswood.snap.net.nz> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 06:38:00 -0000 To: Bob Rossi Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: asynchronous MI output commands In-Reply-To: <20060508002935.GN25114@brasko.net> References: <17500.8198.679332.240864@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060506040637.GA14894@nevyn.them.org> <20060506114933.GF25114@brasko.net> <20060506152046.GA24267@nevyn.them.org> <20060506164030.GK25114@brasko.net> <20060506165249.GA25972@nevyn.them.org> <20060506194618.GL25114@brasko.net> <20060506203741.GA29439@nevyn.them.org> <20060507004518.GM25114@brasko.net> <20060507212711.GA18344@nevyn.them.org> <20060508002935.GN25114@brasko.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.47 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 > Anyways, Daniel, thanks for taking time out of your busy schedule to > think about this issue. If you simply don't want something like this in > MI right now, I'll find a way to match the input with the output. I must say that I agree with Daniel. I think that by trying to classify the output as synchronous/asynchronous you're creating a problem, not solving one. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob