Re: Bug in MI command -data-dissasemble ??

Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues de Almeida
2006-03-03T17:21:14Z

Hi all,
I'll try to figure out what is going on.. Is there some document that
describes the organization of the GDB code?? Is there some place where
I can grab more information?

Thank you.

Eduardo
On 3/1/06, Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues de Almeida
<eduardo.almeida@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was trying the -data-disassemble command and I found something strange.
> I think with a session I can explain better:
>
>
> [eduardo@~/lab3/Debug]$gdb -i=mi2
> ~"GNU gdb 6.4\n"
> ~"Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n"
> ~"GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and
> you are\n"
> ~"welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain
> conditions.\n"
> ~"Type \"show copying\" to see the conditions.\n"
> ~"There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type \"show warranty\" for
> details.\n"
> ~"This GDB was configured as \"x86_64-pc-linux-gnu\"."
> ~"\n"
> (gdb)
> -file-exec-and-symbols lab3
> ~"Using host libthread_db library \"/lib/libthread_db.so.1\".\n"
> ^done
> (gdb)
> -data-disassemble -f /home/eduardo/libgip/src/gip_app.cpp -l 68 -n 1 -- 1
> &"mi_cmd_disassemble: Invalid line number\n"
> ^error,msg="mi_cmd_disassemble: Invalid line number"
> (gdb)
> -data-disassemble -f gip_app.cpp -l 68 -n 1 -- 1
> ^done,asm_insns=[{address="0x000000000040d7e0",func-name="_Z12gip_app_initPc",offset="0",inst="mov
> %rbx,0xfffffffffffffff0(%rsp)"}]
> (gdb)
> -data-disassemble -f /home/eduardo/libgip/src/gip_app1.cpp -l 68 -n 1 -- 1
> &"mi_cmd_disassemble: Invalid filename.\n"
> ^error,msg="mi_cmd_disassemble: Invalid filename."
> (gdb)
>
>
> The gip_app.cpp is a file of a library I used to compile lab3.
> When I use the complete path (/home/eduardo/libgip/src/gip_app.cpp)
> GDB gives me error messge invalid LINE number. When I use only the
> file name(gip_app.cpp) the disassemble works. The path is right
> because when I specify a wrong file GDB gives me another
> message(Invalid filename)
>
> I think this is a bug.. at least the message is wrong.. the line
> number is valid.
>
> Thank you,
> Eduardo
>