From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24729 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2006 17:52:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 24720 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2006 17:52:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sadr.equallogic.com (HELO sadr.equallogic.com) (66.155.203.134) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:52:11 +0000 Received: from sadr.equallogic.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sadr.equallogic.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k1EHq9TY002202 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:52:09 -0500 Received: from M31.equallogic.com (M31.equallogic.com [172.16.1.31]) by sadr.equallogic.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id k1EHq8GF002197; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:52:08 -0500 Received: from pkoning.equallogic.com ([172.16.1.169]) by M31.equallogic.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:51:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17394.6343.166276.623893@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:52:00 -0000 From: Paul Koning To: drow@false.org Cc: f.hackenberger@chello.at, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: breakpoints in shared libraries References: <200602141729.09355.f.hackenberger@chello.at> <20060214170031.GA26297@nevyn.them.org> <200602141810.21510.f.hackenberger@chello.at> <20060214171343.GA26884@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 06:10:21PM +0100, Florian Daniel> Hackenberger wrote: >> On Tuesday 14 February 2006 18:00, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > This >> has nothing to do with shared libraries; if you search the > >> archives for breakpoints in constructors, you'll learn lots more >> about > the (still unsolved) problem. Thank you very much for the >> quick answer. Is the problem resolved with gcc >=4.0? Daniel> No, there's no resolution today. I did a hack solution as a local tweak to GDB 5.3 -- a few lines worth of change to set the "verbose" flag in the demangler calls. That way, the several flavors of constructor and destructor end up with different names. Odd ones, admittedly, but it allows them to be referenced individually. I wouldn't hold it up as a real solution, but it's a workaround, if you care to use it. paul